They Start Slowly And Quietly… And Then They Outperform

Inside today’s Daily Journal

  • Essay: The Leaders You’ve Never Heard Of

  • AI capex hits debt wall

  • Wall Street happy, Main Street sad

  • The war supply shock is about to hit

  • Chart Of The Day… Nvidia

  • Today’s Mailbag

Editor’s note: After visiting Emmet Savage in Ireland a few weeks ago, Porter was so impressed that he is turning the Daily Journal over to him today – Emmet is chief investor and co-founder of the research firm MyWallSt. He has been involved in the stock market for more than two decades, with an independently proven annual return in excess of 24% for the last decade – more than triple what the S&P 500 returned. Emmet has previously written for The Motley Fool and has been included in the Irish America magazine’s “Top 50 On Wall Street” list… twice!

Here’s Emmet…

There is a particular kind of pain that only investors know.

It is not the pain of losing money. That stings, but it fades. The pain I am talking about is more corrosive: it’s the pain of missing out. A company you noticed, early, when it was still small and unknown and promising. And then you did nothing about it. You watched it for years while other people got rich. That is the one that got away – because you just weren’t sure.

I have spent decades thinking about what separates the companies that become extraordinary from the ones that become merely fine. The quality of the business model matters. The size of the addressable market matters. Financials matter.

But none of those things, individually or together, fully explain why some companies create wealth for decades while others plateau, stumble, and disappoint.

The differentiator, in my experience, is almost always the person at the top.

What Winners Have In Common

In the late 1990s, a management researcher named Jim Collins looked at all the companies that had underperformed the market for 15 years and then dramatically reversed course. After his analysis, he set out to answer a deceptively simple question: What did they have in common?

He studied 1,435 Fortune 500 companies. Only 11 of those had a leader that Collins called “Level 5.”

Level 5 leaders are not the charismatic visionaries that grace magazine covers. They are, if anything, the opposite. They are deeply humble. Personally modest to the point of deflecting attention. And yet they are ferociously, almost frighteningly resolute when it comes to the long-term health of the businesses they run.

Collins described it as a “paradoxical combination” of intense professional will with deep personal humility. These people set up successors for even greater greatness than their own. They are intolerant of mediocrity, and they are relentless in their resolve to build something that lasts.

Take Darwin Smith, who ran Kimberly-Clark (KMB) for 20 years. He was, by all accounts, shy, self-conscious, and almost allergic to public attention. He refused to put his photograph in the annual report. He spent his summers on a farm in Wisconsin. And over two decades, he turned Kimberly-Clark from a lagging paper company into one that hammered the S&P 500 by relentlessly removing everything that wasn’t working and investing in everything that was.

The lesson: when you find these leaders, you invest in them. Because they will see their companies through decades of market-beating returns not by being the loudest voice in the room, but by never, ever letting up.

Where This Gets Interesting For Nova Members

We at MyWallSt have been building the Nova portfolio for months – 13 companies, 13 conviction positions.

Nova is a collection of high-alpha U.S. stocks that we believe will outperform the market. It is built on a singular, proven conviction: owning a small number of exceptional companies for the long term reduces stress and creates life-changing wealth. It is a high-conviction portfolio, meticulously balanced to anchor and grow your capital.

Here is the general breakdown of how we select them:

  • Bedrocks: The foundation. Proven, durable companies built to weather any market storm.

  • Accelerators: The engine. Growth leaders with proven success and massive room to scale.

  • Moonshots: The rocket fuel. Ambitious, industry-transforming bets with the potential to become “100-baggers.

And I want to be honest with you about something. When we look back at this list, really look back at it, with the benefit of years rather than quarters, I believe a handful of these names will be remembered the way we now think of the early shareholders of Walmart (WMT), or Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), or the companies that seemed unremarkable until they suddenly weren’t unremarkable.

I cannot tell you which ones. That would take away the pleasure of finding out together.

What I can tell you is this: several of the leaders running the companies in this portfolio show, in our assessment, unmistakable signs of Level 5 leadership.

One is a founder who still runs the business he built from nothing over three decades ago, owns a substantial personal stake, and has spent his career refusing to chase volume at the expense of quality, even when the market would have rewarded him handsomely for doing so. He is not famous. He does not appear on panels or give keynote speeches. He just compiles one of the most remarkable operating records in his industry, year after year, without much fanfare.

Another is a surgeon who looked at a broken system, decided to fix it himself, and has spent 25 years building the infrastructure to do exactly that. His personal stake is meaningful, and the business he has built has no real precedent. It is genuinely changing the odds of survival for patients who otherwise would not make it.

A third built an entire company to solve a problem that the industry had accepted as permanent. He is a technical founder who lives inside the details, refuses to compromise on reliability, and has consistently delivered on milestones that his more famous competitors have repeatedly missed.

There are others. And across this portfolio, the recurring pattern is founders and long-tenured operators who have skin in the game, who have resisted the easy path, and who are building for a horizon that most investors are not even looking at yet.

Why Now Is Not The Time To Wait

Markets are volatile, the news cycle is exhausting, and there is always a reason to wait.

But the investors who caught the ones that got away did not wait for a clear signal. They made a decision before the Wall Street analysts did, before the mainstream press caught on, before the stock had already done most of its best work.

The 13 companies in Nova are not all household names. Some of them are barely known outside their own industries. A few are not yet profitable. One or two are genuinely early-stage, the kind of early-stage where most investors won’t look because the numbers aren’t yet tidy enough.

That is precisely why we are here.

All 13 names are available to Nova members now.

The window does not stay open forever, and the companies that have Level 5 leaders at the helm are the ones I would most hate to regret having missed.

And for those who are wondering… Jim Collins, that management researcher who found the small handful of winners among the 1,435 Fortune 500 companies, was clearly on to something – proving his theory in his best-selling book Good To Great, which is on the short list of must-reads for any business-minded person.

Happy investing,

Emmet Savage
MyWallSt.

Porter recently sat down with Emmet and one thing Emmet reveals is that he’s found his next 100-bagger. A U.S.-listed stock that he says could be the next Tesla, Nvidia, or Netflix… He adds: “and I’m personally going in very heavily with my own money.”

In Porter’s interview with Emmet, you’ll discover more about this under-the-radar company that’s applying AI to an archaic industry that’s refused to adapt to the times.

Go here now to see Porter and Emmet’s conversation before it’s too late.

Tell us what you think: [email protected]

3 Things To Know Before We Go…

1. The coming due date for today’s AI spending. Data center capex has reached $930 billion in six years – larger than the Interstate Highway System, U.S. railroads, the Apollo space program, and the Marshall Plan. But these investments come with rising debt loads that are about to hit a maturity wall – with more than $330 billion of borrowing maturing by 2028, most of it issued during the 2020 low-interest-rate era. Refinancing begins in the second half of this year at materially higher rates. The AI narrative is about to meet its cost of capital.

2. The S&P 500 hits an all-time high as consumer sentiment hits an all-time low. In nearly 50 years of data, we have never seen a gap this wide between what Wall Street is pricing and what Main Street is feeling. Historically, when consumer sentiment sinks this low – equities eventually follow sentiment down, not the other way around. The market cannot ignore the consumer forever.

3. The real supply shock from the war is only just beginning. Over the weekend, the USS Spruance seized the Iranian-flagged container ship Touska in the Gulf of Oman, after Iran reclaimed control of the Strait of Hormuz and attacked several ships in retaliation for the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports. Trump threatened to “knock out every single Power Plant, and every single Bridge, in Iran” unless a deal is reached. Crude oil prices rose 6% on the news. But the bigger story is still unfolding: The last tankers to leave the Strait before the February closure only recently reached their destinations in Europe, Asia, and North America – meaning the real energy supply shock is just beginning. Meanwhile, Asian refineries have already drawn down onshore inventories significantly… Even a permanent deal this week won’t change that math for weeks, at best.

Chart Of The Day… Nvidia

Complete Investor recommendation Nvidia (NVDA) ponied up $2 billion in a funding round for Cursor, the AI code editor that went from zero to $2 billion in revenue in three years – the fastest B2B scaling in history. This is Nvidia playing the entire AI value chain: sell the chips that train the models, then take equity in the companies turning those models into products every developer on Earth will pay for. NVDA shares are up 18% for the month.

Mailbag

In Friday’s Daily Journal, Porter wrote the essay, “A Turning Is Coming in 2029,” describing a measured pattern of four distinct 21-year periods driven by human nature. Readers share their thoughts…

“The Fourth Turning”

Gerry C. writes:

I am as old as the cycle, and I am an economic historian (just like you are) and I have reached the same conclusions. I have read The Fourth Turning, and I could not ignore the messaging. In short, I see a potential Global Societal Chaos Era.

To start, my conclusions on the economy are more a function of the economic data – the keys of which are money supply, the level of deficit spending (and its causes), and the debt (and the cost of the interest payments). All of these alone will inevitably create an economic crisis in the U.S., which will have global implications.

All that said, I also believe that the geopolitical and cultural issues (all too many are already being put in place), plus the rise of the most disruptive technologies in the evolution of human history, are going to make this Turning the most disruptive in human history. One that humankind might not even survive.

These technologies (AI – evolving into AGI or even superhuman intelligence), humanoid robotics (evolving into full human labor replacement), and the coupling with quantum computing (eliminating all secrecy or privacy) will all replace human labor in staggering proportion to the available human population, causing in essence wealth creation where human labor is no longer a core “factor of production.” That alone will potentially cause chaos in all societies across the globe.

I obviously want to be wrong, and I want to be optimistic, but I see nothing happening today that is going to address this Epochal Series of Events, and because of that, I worry about the survival of my family, and eventually of society as a whole.

“A 2029 Crisis Will Send Gold Prices To The Moon”

Hank B. writes:

Fantastic summary of research that time has proven to be accurate. My first reaction is that preparation for 2029 will send the price of gold to the moon. I am anxious to know your opinion on how long we should expect this AI bull market to last before converting to cash and on to safer though much lower return investments? I am 82 and just retired seven months ago and desperately need to know what the forecast is for inflation over the next five to 10 years. I have adequate net worth for a 3% to 4% annual inflation but not if near double digit or above.

“Your Thoughts On Martin Armstrong”

Bill S. writes:

Porter,

I have been a financial advisor for 42 years and am nearing retirement. I have been a subscriber and avid reader of your research for over 20 years. My clients and I have benefited from your work and honesty. Besides stocks, I have been accumulating gold and silver since 2005, and Bitcoin since 2014. I have learned that everything in life has a cycle.

I agree with you completely on this subject. I read all of your books and have studied Turning authors Strauss and Howe as well, since reading Generations: The History Of America’s Future 35 years ago. I know you must have seen Martin Armstrong’s work (what he calls the Economic Confidence Model) – he comes to a very similar conclusion with his AI computer he calls Socrates. It’s a cycle work project with a culmination in 2032 (close enough). I have been a subscriber to his work since the 1980s.

I wonder why you have never mentioned his work. I may have missed it, but I don’t think so. It coincides so closely with The Fourth Turning and Ray Dalio’s work, but I know the financial community ignores him completely for many reasons.

I am interested in your opinion.

Thank you for all you do, and have done.

Porter Comment: I don’t know anything personally about Martin Armstrong or his cycle research. But, as a rule, I don’t do business with anyone who has pled guilty (2006) to a felony. Especially not in a case involving $700 million in investor losses. And please… I know his followers believe he is innocent. Maybe so. But his broker-dealer, Republic New York Securities, also pled guilty to securities fraud in the same case and was forced to pay out significant restitution as a result.

As you may know, the Feds targeted me too, at around the same time (2003). I wrote a report they didn’t like. (It alleged serious securities fraud at the Department of Energy.) A couple of key differences: 1. The stock I recommended nearly tripled by the time my case came to trial. 2. Mine was a civil fraud case, not a criminal case. There were no substantial losses by any investors. 3. I never owned the stock, nor did I ever broker the stock. This was a pure speech case triggered because one of my sources lied about what he told me. 4. I refused to settle with the Securities And Exchange Commission (“SEC”) because I did absolutely nothing wrong. The result was a seven-year legal nightmare that should have bankrupted me. But I wasn’t ever going to admit doing something I knew I didn’t do. If Martin Armstrong were innocent, then I think he should have done the same. 5. After many appeals, I was able to get the SEC’s injunction lifted in 2023.

Ironically, I’d argue that the hallmark of my entire career has been bringing a vastly higher standard of transparency and integrity to the entire financial newsletter industry, including publishing thorough track records, only hiring bona fide experts to write about securities, and a business model – lifetime subscriptions – that rewards the publisher only when his advice has proven to be valuable over the long-term. I am many, many things… but a liar I am not.

“The Turning”

Tom L. writes:

Porter, what do you think of the probability that the government may declare a “debt jubilee” sometime in the future, and what would be the trigger for it to happen? Also, do you think that they have discussed this in Washington (behind closed doors, of course)?

Porter Comment: I’m certain they’re going to default. But, as usual, the Jubilee will be for them – not for you.

Please note: The investments in our “Porter & Co. Top Positions” should not be considered current recommendations. These positions are the best performers across our publications – and the securities listed may (or may not) be above the current buy-up-to price. To learn more, visit the current recommendations page of the relevant service, here. To gain access or to learn more about our current recommendations, call our Customer Care team at 888-610-8895 or internationally at +1 443-815-4447.

Keep Reading